Yesterday, my Facebook feed went a little crazy with topics of tolerance and discrimination. In short, someone I consider my friend hurt a group of people who I also consider my friends. There was an, in my opinion, an intolerant response to a perceived intolerance. So, I considered writing about the irony of these things and I considered writing about homosexuality being the new race card, but in the end I didn't think I could bend these articles to be anything other than causing division. So, instead, I settled on tolerance.
In work we talk about tolerance. In high school they talk to the kids about tolerance. On TV, you see hot topics of tolerance, and intolerance. What is it, though? In medicine tolerance is a common topic in pharmaceuticals. In many cases, your body builds up a tolerance to the chemicals it is exposed to. I for example, at this point in my life, has a ridiculous tolerance to caffeine. My body is numb to the stimulating effects of this substance. Many people have to rotate allergy medicine for this same reason, they stop working after a few weeks. In this case tolerance is like a numbness. In engineering, tolerance is a different thing, often used with phrases like acceptable tolerances. In this case tolerance is like a line, the widget is either in the acceptable tolerances, or it is not. If it is not, you throw it out and maybe rework the system. You have these lines, these tolerances, to make sure you have a quality project which meets your customers needs. Part of the function of this tolerance is knowing when you need to discard something. Is this what we want, is this what we want tolerance to be? Do we want to make people numb to the differences between us? Do we want to have a line which we drop people because they no longer fit? Worse, do we want to lack so much conviction that we'll tolerate anything? It seems this very thought, this very word, misses the mark.
I am not like my friends, in some cases I am drastically different. My friend Paul and I could not be more different on our perspective on religion. In fact, in just religious topics, I have an established different point of view than my friends, James, Justin (also my brother), Keith, Matt, Kevin and the list could go on. Politically, I don't think I would be more different than my friends LeeAnn or John. I have friends of varying race and gender and sexuality. I have friends who have varying positions on race and gender and sexuality. If I look hard enough, I will be able to find disagreement with nearly every person I consider a friend.
If they look at me with the same eye, they will see all the differences I present to them. If they do this with tolerance they will either be numb to me, effectively rendering what ever relationship we have useless, or they decide if I am over their line or not. They will distill me down to the one trait we disagree on and if I meet their standard. If I don't meet their tolerance, just like the mechanical process, I am dumped.
Is this what I want them to do? Is this how we are supposed to relate to each other? I don't want to be treated that way. I suspect you don't either. Honestly, I don't think we are meant to relate to each other in tolerance. We should be relating to each other in love. When you love someone, you don't start with a line to make sure someone meets your standards, you don't start by deciding what point of view they might hold which means you disregard them. This is how I want to be treated. I want to have those points of difference to be areas we can discuss, not to defeat each other, but so I can understand you and you will understand me. Then, once we come to that place where we understand each other, but disagree, the love you have for me should outshine any hard feelings you might have because of the tension. Don't tolerate me, I'm not asking you to love everything I do, or even like the positions I take on things, but if you call your self my friend, love me.
I can't make this happen. I can't cause anyone to adopt this point of view on friendship. I can't make anyone move from tolerance to love, except for me. So, let me make this commitment to you. I will not define you by the places we disagree, you are more important to me than the sum of your parts and certainly more important than the items we disagree on. I will not unfriend you because of the things you like, which I don't, nor the things you don't like which I do. I will tell you when I think you are wrong and I would like you to do the same for me. If we can't learn from each other, what is the point? I may not always agree with you, but I will respect you and, as much as I am able, I will ask others to respect you. Additionally, I permit you to make mistakes, say things you don't mean and hurt me when you are thoughtless. You are my friend, so my forgiveness is always at hand. I may break this commitment from time to time, not because I want to, but because I am human and selfish and thoughtless. So, I ask you to do me a favor, when I fail, rather then making it the sum of my parts and walking away from me, tell me I am wrong, help me, so I can do better, we can be better. Lastly, I don't expect you to make this commitment with me. I am OK with that, not that it won't hurt sometimes, but because real love is more about what you do when you are hurt, rather than when everything is going great.